Testwiki:Property proposal/in defining formula
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Motivation
Seems to be missing information about P2534 (Add your motivation for this property here.) --- Jura 10:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
- To bo honest, I do not really understand the proposal. How does it compare to the has part annotations that are used for example in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q35875?--Physikerwelt (talk) 17:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. Use of Template:P on items with Template:P seems pretty random. There are currently 97 items on [1]: they don't appear to be structured. It might work on one or the other item when reading the statement 1-by-1 and knowing in advance what to look for. Also, the proposal might not be suitable for every item about physics. --- Jura 11:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I just noticed your comment on Property_talk:P416 once more. Maybe you were looking for something in the same direction. --- Jura 04:34, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was looking to use Template:P. I see no need for this new property. Swpb (talk) 15:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I don't think it's currently defined as being used that way nor does it appear to be particularly structured to do so. Also, I think it's better to use the same format/datatype. --- Jura 16:28, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was looking to use Template:P. I see no need for this new property. Swpb (talk) 15:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
- Template:S. Logical property.--Arbnos (talk) 13:55, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping project ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 15:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping Template:Done Now Template:P. --Lymantria (talk) 16:27, 28 August 2019 (UTC)